离子交换法脱除磷酸中锰离子的动态吸附研究

doi:10.11962/1006-4990.2020-0096

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来离子交换技术在湿法磷酸净化领域得到了广泛的发展与应用。采用Sinco-430型阳离子交换树脂脱除磷酸中的锰离子,考察了流量、磷酸溶液初始锰浓度、温度对吸附效果的影响。结果表明：增大进液流量、提高溶液初始锰浓度以及升高温度均有利于缩短树脂饱和时间,但进液流量的增大会降低树脂的吸附率,而温度的升高则会降低树脂的饱和吸附量。在进液流量为4.0 mL/min、溶液初始锰质量浓度为10.22 mg/mL、体系温度为35 ℃的条件下,树脂对锰离子的饱和吸附量为64.76 mg/g、吸附效率为63.55%。采用Thomas,Yoon-Nelson和Yan 3种吸附模型对动态吸附过程数据进行拟合,发现Yan模型的拟合效果最佳,而且由其计算得出的饱和吸附量与实验测定值的相对偏差在6.93%~10.91%。

关键词: 离子交换, 锰离子, 磷酸, 动态吸附, 模型拟合

Abstract:

In recent years,ion exchange technology has been widely developed and applied in the purification of wet-process phosphoric acid.Sinco-430 cation exchange resin was used to remove manganese ions from phosphoric acid.The effects of in-flow rate,initial manganese concentration of phosphoric acid solution and temperature on the adsorption performance were investigated.The results showed that increasing inflow rate,initial manganese concentration and temperature were all con-ducive to shortening the saturation time of resin.However,the increase of inflow rate will reduce the adsorption rate of resin,and the increase of temperature will reduce the saturated adsorption capacity of resin.Under the conditions that the inflow rate was 4.0 mL/min,the initial manganese mass concentration of solution was 10.22 mg/mL and the temperature was 35 ℃,the saturated adsorption capacity of the resin for manganese ions was 64.76 mg/g,and the adsorption efficiency was 63.55%.Thomas,Yoon-Nelson and Yan dynamic adsorption model were used to fit the experimental data of dynamic adsorption pro-cess.It was found that the Yan model fitted best,and the relative deviation between the saturated adsorption capacity calcu-lated by the Yan model and the experimental value was 6.93%~10.91%.

Key words: ion exchange, manganese ion, phosphoric acid, dynamic adsorption, model fitting

中图分类号:

TQ137.12

庄海波,杨林,邓强,叶润州,吴赵敏. 离子交换法脱除磷酸中锰离子的动态吸附研究[J]. 无机盐工业, 2021, 53(1): 18-23.

Zhuang Haibo,Yang Lin,Deng Qiang,Ye Runzhou,Wu Zhaomin. Study on dynamic adsorption of Mn ²⁺ from phosphoric acid by ion exchange technology[J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2021, 53(1): 18-23.

图/表 12

表1

图1

图2

表2

图3

表3

图4

表4

图5

表5

表6

表7

参考文献 18

[1]	Kouzbour S, Gourich B, Gros F, et al. Comparative analysis of indus-trial processes for cadmium removal from phosphoric acid:A revi-ew[J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2019,188:222-247.
[2]	马超, 吴元欣, 金放, 等. 磷酸的工业生产研究现状与展望[J]. 化学工程, 2013,41(6):74-78.
[3]	王同永. 湿法磷酸净化技术应用研究[J]. 山东化工, 2018,47(12):122-123.
[4]	张亚明, 李文超, 王海军. 我国磷矿资源开发利用现状[J]. 化工矿物与加工, 2020,49(6):43-46.
[5]	罗惠华, 刘连坤, 朱道鹏, 等. 黄麦岭磷矿除镁降锰选矿试验研究[J]. 中国非金属矿工业导刊, 2017(1):17-20.
[6]	黄懿, 张志业, 王辛龙, 等. 溶剂萃取法脱除湿法磷酸中锰离子的实验研究[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2018,33(4):5-7.
[7]	Leng X, Zhong Y, Xu D, et al. Mechanism and kinetics study on removal of iron from phosphoric acid by cation exchange resin[J]. Chin.J.Chem.Eng., 2019,27(5):1050-1057.
[8]	Tang C, Qiu Y, Wang Y, et al. Kinetic studies on Al³+ removal from phosphoric acid by cation exchange resin[J]. Can.J.Chem.Eng., 2018,96(4):944-954.
[9]	Abdel-Ghafar H M, Abdel-Aal E A, Ibrahim M A M, et al. Purifi-cation of high iron wet-process phosphoric acid via oxalate precipi-tation method[J]. Hydrometallurgy, 2019,184:1-8.
[10]	Jin Y, Ma Y, Weng Y, et al. Solvent extraction of Fe³+ from the hy-drochloric acid route phosphoric acid by D2EHPA in kerosene[J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2014,20(5):3446-3452.
[11]	Dang L, Wei H, Zhu Z, et al. The influence of impurities on phosp-horic acid hemihydrate crystallization[J]. J.Cryst.Growth, 2007,307(1):104-111.
[12]	杨帆, 胡方峰, 陈金芳. 十二烷基苯磺酸乳化液膜法净化湿法磷酸除镁[J]. 云南化工, 2008(1):24-29.
[13]	刘安荣, 李敬, 王振杰, 等. 离子交换法脱除湿法磷酸中铁、铝杂质的研究[J]. 化工矿物与加工, 2019,48(5):57-59.
[14]	熊祥祖, 王威, 李志保, 等. 离子交换树脂脱除湿法磷酸中金属杂质的研究[J]. 武汉工程大学学报, 2009,31(7):26-29.
[15]	杨政琦, 周学克, 阮云刚, 等. 离子交换树脂脱除湿法磷酸中的铝和镁的研究[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2016,31(2):6-7,10.
[16]	龚浩, 郭劲松, 方芳, 等. 改性陶粒对水中卡马西平去除的动态吸附实验及模型[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016,10(7):3573-3579.
[17]	李亚娟, 赵传起, 杨悦锁, 等. 石墨烯基铁氧化物对水体中草甘膦的动态吸附性能及模型[J]. 化工学报, 2018,69(9):3944-3953.
[18]	袁纯怡, 孙玉柱, 杨颖, 等. D301树脂动态吸附溴离子过程探究及模型拟合[J]. 过程工程学报, 2020(6):655-666.

q/（mL·min^-1）	t_s/min	Q_e,exp/（mg·g^-1）	Y/%
2.5	80	56.50	68.57
4.0	64	65.69	62.33
5.0	52	57.94	54.02

C₀ /（mg·mL^-1）	t_s /min	Q_e,exp/（mg·g^-1）	Y/%
7.60	80	56.62	59.93
10.22	64	65.69	62.34
12.78	60	70.49	59.83

T/℃	t_s /min	Q_e,exp/（mg·g^-1）	Y/%
20	64	65.69	62.34
35	62	64.76	63.55
50	60	63.21	63.70

C₀/ （mg·mL^-1）	q/ （mL·min^-1）	T/ ℃	m/ g	Q_e,exp / （mg·g^-1）	Q_e,Th/ （mg·g^-1）	偏差/ %	k_Th / （mL·min^-1·mg^-1）	R²
10.22	2.5	20	22.50	56.50	60.71	7.45	0.013 16	0.953 2
10.22	4.0	20	22.52	65.69	70.06	6.66	0.016 40	0.962 0
10.22	5.0	20	22.47	57.94	63.50	9.61	0.021 24	0.985 0
7.60	4.0	20	22.52	56.63	64.16	13.31	0.017 90	0.992 7
10.22	4.0	20	22.52	65.69	70.06	6.66	0.016 40	0.962 0
12.78	4.0	20	22.57	70.49	75.84	7.59	0.013 66	0.991 2
10.22	4.0	20	22.52	65.69	70.06	6.65	0.016 40	0.962 0
10.22	4.0	35	22.56	64.76	68.53	5.82	0.016 45	0.958 7
10.22	4.0	50	22.42	63.21	66.32	4.92	0.016 57	0.951 8

C₀ / （mg·mL^-1）	q/ （mL·min^-1）	T/ ℃	m/ g	τ_exp / min	τ_cal / min	偏差/ %	k_YN / min^-1	R²
10.22	2.5	20	22.50	57.41	53.47	6.86	0.134 5	0.985 0
10.22	4.0	20	22.52	42.31	38.60	8.77	0.167 6	0.962 0
10.22	5.0	20	22.47	30.66	27.93	8.91	0.217 0	0.953 2
7.60	4.0	20	22.52	50.38	47.53	5.66	0.136 0	0.992 7
10.22	4.0	20	22.52	42.54	38.60	9.26	0.167 6	0.962 0
12.78	4.0	20	22.57	36.81	33.48	9.04	0.174 6	0.991 2
10.22	4.0	20	22.52	42.54	38.60	9.26	0.167 6	0.962 0
10.22	4.0	35	22.56	42.23	37.82	10.44	0.168 1	0.958 7
10.22	4.0	50	22.42	41.68	36.38	12.73	0.169 3	0.951 8

首页

全国无机盐信息中心

中国化工学会

无机酸碱盐专业委员会