响应曲面法优化PAC深度净化高浓度硫酸钠溶液中F-的研究

doi:10.19964/j.issn.1006-4990.2023-0388

Abstract

Abstract:

It was proposed to use polyaluminum chloride（PAC，similarly hereinafter） for deep purification of F^- in high concentration sodium sulfate solution.The effects of molar ratio of aluminum to fluoride，reaction endpoint pH and flocculation time on the removal rate of F^- were studied.The regression equation model obtained through the response surface method was used to predict the optimal experimental condition parameters for deep purification of F^-.At the same time，the obtained response surface map and contour map were used to intuitively reflect the influence of various factors on the removal rate of fluoride ions and the strength of their interaction.The significant factors affecting the removal rate of fluoride ions from high to low were endpoint pH，molar ratio of aluminum to fluorine，and flocculation time.The response surface methodology was used to optimize the mathematical model established by PAC to remove fluoride ions from high concentration sodium sulfate solution.The fitting value was highly consistent with the validation test results.The stock solution contained 292.85 g/L of salt and 70.58 mg/L of fluoride ions.The optimal process parameters of model optimization：the molar ratio of aluminum to fluoride was 15.6，the endpoint pH was 7.6，and the flocculation time was 50 min.The removal rate of fluoride ions was 94.03%，which was verified by three tests.It was found that the actual average removal rate of fluoride ions was 93.56% after multiple experimental verifications.The difference between the removal rate of fluoride ions and the predicted value of the model was 0.47%.The fluoride ions in the liquid could be reduced from 70.58 mg/L to 4.55 mg/L after purification，indicating high accuracy and reliability of the model optimization conditions.

Key words: high concentration sodium sulfate solution, deep purification, fluoride ion, aluminium chlorohydrate, response surface methodology

CLC Number:

TQ124.3

LIU Xiaowen, LI Jun, ZHOU Zhaoan, MAO Anzhang, ZHOU Aiqing. Study on response surface methodology optimization of PAC for deep purification of fluorine ion in high concentration sodium sulfate solution[J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2024, 56(6): 67-72.

Figures/Tables 12

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Fig.4

Fig.5

Table 7

References 14

1	赖敏明，徐先宝，李响.工业废盐的处理及其资源化研究进展［J］.应用化工，2023，52（1）：215-218，222.
	LAI Minming， XU Xianbao， LI Xiang.Research progress on the treatment and resource utilization of industrial waste salt［J］.Applied Chemical Industry，2023，52（1）：215-218，222.
2	CHURCH J， HWANG J H， KIM K T，et al.Effect of salt type and concentration on the growth and lipid content of Chlorella vulgaris in synthetic saline wastewater for biofuel production［J］.Bioresource Technology，2017，243：147-153.
3	周兆安，李俊，刘小文，等.高化学需氧量工业废盐炭化除杂及精制工艺研究［J］.无机盐工业，2023，55（9）：100-105.
	ZHOU Zhaoan， LI Jun， LIU Xiaowen，et al.Study on carbonization and purification process of high COD industrial waste salt［J］.Inorganic Chemicals Industry，2023，55（9）：100-105.
4	曹明义，何国凯，汤丹平.多级中和沉淀法在钢铁酸洗废水中的除氟应用［J］.冶金动力，2021，40（5）：73-75.
	CAO Mingyi， HE Guokai， TANG Danping.Application of multistage neutralization precipitation method in fluoride removal from steel pickling wastewater［J］.Metallurgical Power，2021，40（5）：73-75.
5	李雪玲，刘俊峰，李培元.石灰沉淀法除氟的应用［J］.水处理技术，2000，26（6）：359-361.
	LI Xueling， LIU Junfeng， LI Peiyuan.Principle and application of fluoride removal by lime sedimentation method［J］.Technology of Water Treatment，2000，26（6）：359-361.
6	张钰卿，刘佳，许兵，等.含氟废水处理中的除氟吸附技术研究进展［J］.净水技术，2022，41（5）：23-29，61.
	ZHANG Yuqing， LIU Jia， XU Bing，et al.Research progress of adsorption technology for defluorination in fluoride-containing wastewater treatment［J］.Water Purification Technology，2022，41（5）：23-29，61.
7	象豫，徐慧，李昆，等.铜绿微囊藻对混凝除氟的促进作用及机理分析［J］.中国环境科学，2021，41（4）：1900-1908.
	XIANG Yu， XU Hui， LI Kun，et al.Promotion effect of Microcystis aeruginosa on defluorination by coagulation and its mechanism analysis［J］.China Environmental Science，2021，41（4）：1900-1908.
8	赵鹤谦.高浓度含氟工业废水除氟技术研究进展［J］.辽宁化工，2022，51（12）：1748-1750.
	ZHAO Heqian.Research progress in fluorine removal technology of high concentration fluorine-containing industrial wastewater［J］.Liaoning Chemical Industry，2022，51（12）：1748-1750.
9	顾晨晨.改性除氟剂对含氟废水深度处理方案优化［J］.山东化工，2021，50（20）：264-266，268.
	GU Chenchen.Optimization of fluorine-containing wastewater treat-ment［J］.Shandong Chemical Industry，2021，50（20）：264-266， 268.
10	鲁俊雀，吕志斌，刘勇奇，等.用硫酸铝去除高氟硫酸盐溶液中的氟［J］.湿法冶金，2023，42（2）：195-198，218.
	LU Junque， LÜ Zhibin， LIU Yongqi，et al.Removal of fluoride from high fluoride sulfate solution by aluminum sulfate［J］.Hydrometallurgy of China，2023，42（2）：195-198，218.
11	刘思琴，吴克明，孙大林.用针铁矿法从锌浸出液中除氟实验研究［J］.湿法冶金，2015，34（6）：512-515.
	LIU Siqin， WU Keming， SUN Dalin.Removal of iron and fluorine from leaching solution in zinc hydrometallurgy［J］.Hydrometallurgy of China，2015，34（6）：512-515.
12	万挺，梅晶.硫酸锌溶液中混凝沉淀降氟实验研究［J］.广州化工，2013，41（24）：84-85，117.
	WAN Ting， MEI Jing.An experimental study of coagulative precipitation process for fluoride removal from zinc sulfate soluti-on［J］.Guangzhou Chemical Industry，2013，41（24）：84-85，117.
13	卢建杭，刘维屏，郑巍.铝盐混凝去除F-的作用机理探讨［J］.环境科学学报，2000，20（6）：709-713.
	LU Jianhang， LIU Weiping， ZHENG Wei.The removal mechanisms of fluoride ion by aluminum salt coagulant［J］.Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae，2000，20（6）：709-713.
14	章丽萍，安逸云，吴二勇，等.响应曲面法优化含氟矿井水处理及除氟机理研究［J］.矿业科学学报，2022，7（6）：782-792.
	ZHANG Liping， AN Yiyun， WU Eryong，et al.Optimization of fluorine mine water treatment and fluorine removal mechanism using response surface methodology［J］.Journal of Mining Science and Technology，2022，7（6）：782-792.

除氟剂种类	铝（钙）氟物质的量比	ρ（原液中F^-）/ （mg·L^-1）	ρ（去除后溶液中F^-）/（mg·L^-1）	F^-去除率/%
氯化钙	10	70.58	62.20	11.87
氧化钙	10	70.58	54.29	23.07
硫酸铝	10	70.58	65.41	7.34
PAC	10	70.58	13.80	80.45

自变量		铝氟物质的量比	絮凝时间/min	终点pH
符号		A	B	C
编码水平	-1	10	30	7
	0	13	40	8
	1	16	50	9

差来源	平方和	自由度	均方差	F值	P值	显著性
模型	478.92	9	53.21	363.38	< 0.000 1	非常显著
A	98.49	1	98.49	672.57	< 0.000 1	非常显著
B	10.49	1	10.49	71.62	< 0.000 1	非常显著
C	168.27	1	168.27	1 149.07	< 0.000 1	非常显著
AB	0.055 2	1	0.055 2	0.377 1	0.558 6	不显著
AC	6.45	1	6.45	44.06	0.000 3	非常显著
BC	12.29	1	12.29	83.89	< 0.000 1	非常显著
A²	11.39	1	11.39	77.81	< 0.000 1	非常显著
B²	0.699 2	1	0.699 2	4.77	0.065 2	不显著
C²	163.42	1	163.42	1 115.98	< 0.000 1	非常显著
残差	1.03	7	0.146 4
失拟项	0.599 9	3	0.2	1.88	0.273 8	不显著
纯误差	0.425 2	4	0.106 3
总离差	479.95	16

铝氟物质的量比	絮凝时间/ min	终点pH	预测值/%	实验值/%
铝氟物质的量比	絮凝时间/ min	终点pH	F^-去除率	F^-去除率
15.6	50	7.6	94.03	93.95
				93.22
				93.52
平均值				93.56

[1]	LI Chunli, ZHANG Huanhuan, CHENG Zhuo, TANG Xiuhua, ZHANG Fengzhen, YE Yuling. Anti-solvent crystallization process of NH₄VO₃ in NaVO₃-NH₄Cl-H₂O solution system [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2024, 56(5): 39-44.
[2]	ZHANG Conghua, YAN Wenbin, XIAO Jiajun, ZHAO Ke, PENG Shangquan, WEI Yuhong. Reductive leaching technology of manganese anode slag using tartaric acid as reducing agent optimized by RSM [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2023, 55(9): 106-113.
[3]	WANG Yingnan, SHENG Linlin, HUANG Juan, HUANG Zhanbin. Study on adsorption performance of lead from water by coal-fired slag [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2023, 55(8): 109-115.
[4]	TENG Jiayang, FENG Qingge, ZHANG Xuan, QIN Fanghong, FENG Jinghang, HU Jiawen, CHEN Chaohong. Study on preparation of pseudo-boehmite from aluminum dross resource treatment [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2023, 55(11): 130-138.
[5]	ZHANG Zhiqiang, CUI Kangping, CHEN Xing, LI Haiyang. Optimization of preparation of ultrafine chromium oxide by carbothermal reduction of sodium dichromate by response surface methodology [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2023, 55(10): 136-144.
[6]	FANG Weicheng,CHENG Xingxing,SUN Changrong. Optimization of preparation of sludge/fly ash composite ceramsite filler materials by response surface methodology [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2022, 54(9): 119-125.
[7]	FU Ziqi, ZHANG Cheng, SHENG Yong, JI Lijun. Study on preparation of phosphoric acid by leaching fluoride residue from wet-process phosphoric acid with organic solvents [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2022, 54(7): 129-134.
[8]	LI Yajiao,ZHAO Yiwei,JU Kai,TANG Renlong,LI Longqing,SHAO Xiaoping,ZHANG Gaofeng,REN Wuang. Study on optimization of extraction conditions in process of determination of ammonia content in fly ash based on response surface method [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2022, 54(4): 145-151.
[9]	Zhang Hongzhong,Li Cong,Chen Wenliang,Guo Huishi,Zhang Huan,Shi Hang. Research on rapid determination method of fluoride ion in leachate of overhaul residue [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2021, 53(7): 105-108.
[10]	Xu Naicai,Shi Dandan,Li Sixia. Research on structure regulation and fluorine removal property of mesoporous alumina [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2020, 52(6): 20-23.
[11]	Huang Jiming,Liu Runqing,Wu Sizhan,Song Juan. Optimization of extraction process of chlorination roasting-water leaching process for low-grade rhodochrosite by response surface methodology [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2019, 51(3): 34-37.
[12]	CHEN Bo, SONG Xing-Fu, XU Yan-Xia, SUN Yu-Zhu, YU Jian-Guo. Optimization of preparation of calcium carbonate from continuous crystallization process of ammonium carbonate and conversion of calcium sulfate by response surface methodology [J]. INORGANICCHEMICALSINDUSTRY, 2016, 48(9): 18-.
[13]	Liu Jia;Xie Tian;Qiu Shuyi;Hu Hong;Zeng Guang. Optimization of technology for preparation of ammonium sulphate from phosphogysum by response surface methodology [J]. INORGANICCHEMICALSINDUSTRY, 2009, 0(5): 0-0.

National Inorganic Salts Information Center

Inorganic Acid-Base-Salt Committee of CIESC

Study on response surface methodology optimization of PAC for deep purification of fluorine ion in high concentration sodium sulfate solution

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 14

Related Articles 13

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

编组	自变量			响应值 F^-去除率/%
编组	A	B/min	C	响应值 F^-去除率/%
1	13	50	9	78.65
2	13	40	8	89.97
3	13	30	9	80.12
4	13	50	7	91.09
5	10	40	9	72.92
6	16	40	7	89.77
7	16	50	8	92.89
8	16	30	8	90.58
9	13	30	7	85.55
10	13	40	8	90.52
11	13	40	8	90.62
12	16	40	9	82.90
13	10	50	8	86.53
14	13	40	8	90.86
15	10	40	7	84.87
16	13	40	8	90.48
17	10	30	8	83.75