磷化工企业技术创新效率评价——基于27家上市公司的数据

doi:10.11962/1006-4990.2019-0551

Abstract

Abstract:

Improving the efficiency of technological innovation in phosphorus chemical industry is of great significance to the healthy,orderly and green sustainable development of phosphorus chemical industry.With 27 listed enterprises of phospho-rous chemical industry in different provinces of China as the research objects,the evaluation system of technological innova-tion efficiency was constructed,the input-output data of enterprises in 2018 were collected,and the overall and internal analysis of technological innovation efficiency was carried out based on DEA model.The results showed that：the overall technological innovation efficiency of listed enterprises in China was 0.372,which did not meet the DEA effective standard; low pure technological efficiency or low scale efficiency was the main reason for the non DEA effective technological innovation efficiency of enterprises; close to 3/4 of listed enterprises in phosphorus chemical industry had the decline of scale return of technological innovation investment; 45% of enterprises were not DEA efficient due to redundant R&D funding and 50% of enterprises were not DEA efficient due to insufficient output.Finally,combined with the research conclusion,the countermeasures and suggestions to improve the technological innovation efficiency of phosphorus chemical industry were put forward.

Key words: phosphorus chemical industry, listed enterprises, technological innovation, efficiency, DEA model

CLC Number:

TQ126.3

Yan Huafei,Xiao Jing,Feng Bing. Evaluation of technological innovation efficiency of phosphorus chemical enterprises：Based on the data of 27 listed companies[J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2020, 52(9): 9-14.

Figures/Tables 2

企业名称	TE	PTE	SE	规模报酬	松弛变量
企业名称	TE	PTE	SE	规模报酬	S₁⁺	S₂⁺	S₃⁺	S₁^-	S₂^-
川恒股份	0.131	0.309	0.424	drs	0.000	0.000	167 116.812	668.520	0.000
澄星股份	1.000	1.000	1.000	—	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
六国化工	0.243	0.243	0.998	—	0.000	0.041	0.000	1 693.096	0.000
兴发集团	0.204	0.408	0.498	drs	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
芭田股份	0.079	1.000	0.079	drs	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
司尔特	0.107	0.564	0.190	drs	0.000	0.000	30 027.293	0.000	0.000
ST宜化	0.275	0.329	0.837	drs	0.000	0.000	0.000	434.957	0.000
云天化	1.000	1.000	1.000	—	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
新洋丰	0.233	0.489	0.477	drs	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
史丹利	0.082	0.409	0.199	drs	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
天原集团	0.370	0.763	0.485	drs	0.000	0.000	0.000	4 297.335	0.000
鲁北化工	0.771	1.000	0.771	drs	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
宏达股份	1.000	1.000	1.000	—	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
川金诺	0.117	0.436	0.269	drs	0.000	0.000	105 938.401	0.000	0.000
金正大	0.202	0.397	0.510	drs	0.000	0.000	0.000	11 471.207	0.000
云图控股	0.343	1.000	0.343	drs	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
金诚信	0.142	0.333	0.426	drs	0.000	0.000	18 666.823	0.000	0.000
新安股份	0.176	1.000	0.176	drs	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
鲁西化工	0.165	0.420	0.394	drs	57.426	0.000	0.000	15 077.823	0.000
三泰控股	1.000	1.000	1.000	—	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
四川美丰	1.000	1.000	1.000	—	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
安纳达	0.111	0.275	0.402	drs	0.000	0.000	171 220.605	419.897	0.000
新农股份	0.094	0.329	0.285	drs	0.000	0.000	226 096.410	772.941	0.000
晨化股份	0.120	0.431	0.279	drs	0.000	0.000	218 845.667	390.281	0.000
洛阳钼业	0.319	1.000	0.319	drs	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000	0.000
罗平锌电	0.649	0.661	0.982	irs	76.176	0.013	0.000	0.000	0.000
雅克科技	0.118	0.327	0.361	drs	0.000	0.000	157 477.769	839.713	0.000
平均值	0.372	0.634	0.545		4.948	0.002	40 569.992	1 335.769	0.000

References 20

[1]	倪文星. 中国磷化工产业国际竞争力研究[D]. 贵阳:贵州财经大学, 2014.
[2]	高永峰. 主要磷化工产品的发展情况和创新发展方向[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2017,32(9):1-5.
[3]	冯永渝, 张建刚, 钟宏波, 等. 磷化工产品标准制定与修订动态分析[J]. 无机盐工业, 2017,49(11):8-11.
[4]	林明, 印华亮. 磷化工产业结构调整方向研究[J]. 无机盐工业, 2016,48(5):6-8.
[5]	黄文俊. 湖北磷化工产业的转型升级绿色发展之路[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2017,32(8):3.
[6]	章成帅. 中国高技术产业技术创新效率研究:一个文献综述[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2016(4):56-62.
[7]	王飞航, 李友顺. 基于三阶段数据包络分析模型的我国西部地区国家级高新区创新效率评价[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019,39(1):55-60.
[8]	肖嘉奕, 陈玉娟, 姚笑秋. 浙江高新技术产业投资效率评价——基于三阶段DEA模型[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018,38(22):78-85.
[9]	王君. 磷化工技术创新与工程化研究[J]. 企业技术开发, 2018(6):111-112.
[10]	贡长生. 我国精细磷化工的发展思路和技术创新[J]. 现代化工, 2006,26(12):1-7.
[11]	李志平. 面向资源与环境的石油化工技术创新与展望研究[J]. 化工管理, 2018(16):76.
[12]	张璇, 袁浩铭, 郝芳华. 财政分权对环保投资效率的影响研究——基于DEA-Tobit模型的分析[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018,38(12):4780-4787.
[13]	Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of de-cision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978,2(6):429-444. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
[14]	Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale in efficiencies in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management Science, 1984,30(9):1078-1092. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
[15]	熊飞, 郑茜, 唐葆君. 基于DEA方法的高新技术企业创新效率研究——以丰台科技园为例[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012,20(专辑):696-701.
[16]	郑坚, 丁云龙. 高技术产业技术创新的边际收益特性及效率分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2008,26(5):1090-1097.
[17]	李阳. 基于网络DEA的地区工业企业技术创新效率研究[J]. 统计与决策, 2015(23):85-89.
[18]	肖仁桥, 陈忠卫, 钱丽. 异质性技术视角下中国高技术制造业创新效率研究[J]. 管理科学, 2018,31(1):48-68.
[19]	梁娜, 姚长青, 高影繁. 基于DEA方法的环保行业上市企业创新效率评价[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019,39(5):45-50.
[20]	Golany B, Roll Y. An application procedure for DEA[J]. Omega, 1989,17(3):237-250. doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(89)90029-7

项目	投入		产出
项目	X₁/万元	X₂/人	Y₁/件	Y₂/万元	Y₃/万元
均值	12 904	343	130	38 852	849 227
最大值	74 905	1 205	403	515 004	5 297 895
最小值	34	9	8	-267 240	65 795
标准差	17 849	305	112	128 666	1 148 494

National Inorganic Salts Information Center

Inorganic Acid-Base-Salt Committee of CIESC

Evaluation of technological innovation efficiency of phosphorus chemical enterprises：Based on the data of 27 listed companies

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 2

References 20

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	WEI Jincai, CHEN Jingyuan, SONG Guichun, JIA Jiantuan, GONG Guoli. Study on efficiency of liquefaction mining of solid potassium ore in western Qarhan area of Qarhan Salt Lake [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2024, 56(3): 70-79.
[2]	PENG Qiugui, YANG Fan, LÜ Renliang, XIANG Lan. Effect of pre-reduction on deferrization in hydrothermal hydrolysis process of Mg/Al/Fe-bearing TiOSO₄ solution [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2023, 55(12): 95-101.
[3]	SU Shaolong,QU Xiaolong,SUN Yanmin,ZHONG Dule,NAN Jun,HAO Ziquan. Study on preparation and performance of high efficient and environmental friendly desulfurizer [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2022, 54(3): 77-81.
[4]	ZHONG Dule,SUN Yanmin,QU Xiaolong,SU Shaolong,HAO Ziquan. Research and application of new high efficiency catalytic desulfurizer [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2022, 54(1): 109-111.
[5]	Huang Donglin,Li Guoqing. Removal of Cl^- from hot-dip galvanized FeCl₂ sludge by vacuum reactive distillation [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2020, 52(8): 72-75.
[6]	Zhao Yang,He Sujiao,He Luhong. Fabriction and properties of flexible perovskite solar cells [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2020, 52(7): 52-54.
[7]	Liu Ying. Synthesis of magnesium ferrite photocatalyst and degradation activity of various dyes [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2020, 52(11): 103-107.
[8]	Wang Zhengwei,Li Xiaobo,Liang Huili,Li Peiying. Analysis and calculation of heat balance and heat utilization efficiency in hydration tower of thermal phosphoric acid [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2020, 52(11): 95-98.
[9]	Wang Xinlong,Xu Dehua,Zhong Yanjun,Yan Zhengjuan,Luo Tao,Yang Xiushan,Wu Zhenguo,Zhong Benhe. Future trend and development course of phosphorus chemical industry for sixty years in China [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2020, 52(10): 9-17.
[10]	Wang Yongli,Liu Ni,Li Haiyang,Liu Jinyan. Preparation of chitosan membrane modified by silica gel and its absorption properties for Cu²⁺ removal [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2019, 51(8): 60-63.
[11]	Zhang Yongxing,Ma Yameng,Zhang Lizhen,Zhang Xiufeng,Tan Xiumin. Experimental research on extracting lithium from concentrated salt lake brine [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2019, 51(3): 38-40.
[12]	LIN Ming, YIN Hua-Liang. Adjustment of direction of phosphorus chemical industry structure [J]. INORGANICCHEMICALSINDUSTRY, 2016, 48(5): 6-.
[13]	ZHONG Jian-Chu, NING Gui-Ling. The urgency for reshaping China′s boron industry structure on its current situation [J]. INORGANICCHEMICALSINDUSTRY, 2016, 48(3): 1-.
[14]	LU You-Zhi, MA Hua-Ju, CHEN Dong-Lian, YUAN Ai-Qun, WEI Dong-Ping, XU Jiang-Cheng. Leaching of low-grade pyrolusite with a compound reductant [J]. INORGANICCHEMICALSINDUSTRY, 2016, 48(2): 53-.
[15]	JI Li-Chun, XIANG Ya-Jun. Alumina recovery from red mud by sintering method of carbide slag [J]. INORGANICCHEMICALSINDUSTRY, 2016, 48(2): 68-.