Catalytic Materials

Deactivation analysis of hydrofining catalyst in different locations of diesel hydrogenation reactor

  • Longnian Han ,
  • Jing Xin ,
  • Linlin Wei ,
  • Wenxuan Fan ,
  • Ping Zhang ,
  • Yufei Chen
Expand
  • CNOOC Research Institute of Refining and Petrochemicals,Beijing 102209,China

Received date: 2020-09-15

  Online published: 2021-09-08

Abstract

In view of the phenomenon that the surface of hydrofining catalyst on the top of hydrofining reactor was covered with scale when the diesel hydrocracking unit in a refinery was shut down,accompanied by replacing catalyst,the sampling analysis of hydrofining catalyst at different location was conducted.The specific surface area and aperture analyzer,carbon sulfur analyzer(C-S),and scanning electron microscope(SEM) were carried out to analyze hydrofining catalyst after toluene extraction and regeneration.The results showed that the amount of carbon deposited on the deactivated catalyst at different location was relatively low,but the catalyst specific surface area and other pore structure parameters obviously decreased which was significantly lower near the top of hydrofining catalyst bed.The regeneration effect of hydrofining catalyst at different location was not ideal.The characteristic diffraction peak of AlPO4 was appeared on the regenerated catalyst,and the inorganic impurities containing P,Si,Fe and little As elements deposited on the surface of hydrofining catalyst,or a little impurities diffused into catalyst channel,which was the main reason of catalyst deactivation.Along the top-down flow direction,the deposition of impurities on the hydrofining catalyst gradually decreased,and the deactivation degree of the hydrofining catalyst weakened.

Cite this article

Longnian Han , Jing Xin , Linlin Wei , Wenxuan Fan , Ping Zhang , Yufei Chen . Deactivation analysis of hydrofining catalyst in different locations of diesel hydrogenation reactor[J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2021 , 53(9) : 114 -118 . DOI: 10.19964/j.issn.1006-4990.2020-0215

References

[1] 王仲义, 彭冲, 姚光纯, 等. 鸟巢型保护剂的研制及其在加氢裂化装置的应用[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2015, 46(6):41-45.
[2] 赵德强, 姜鹏. 催化汽油加氢脱硫装置反应系统压降上升原因分析及对策[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2018, 47(2):26-30.
[3] 李波, 邵玲玲. 氧化铝、氢氧化铝的XRD鉴定[J]. 无机盐工业, 2008, 40(2):54-57.
[4] 苏秋成, 陈佩丽, 张少鸿, 等. 勃姆石热转化过程的原位表征与分析[J]. 无机化学学报, 2012, 28(11):2280-2284.
[5] 孙进, 郭蓉, 杨成敏, 等. 加氢催化剂失活因素与再生活性研究[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2017, 48(5):43-47.
[6] 徐大海, 孙皓, 徐劲瑶, 等. 含硅化合物在汽柴油加氢催化剂上的沉积[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2015, 46(11):62-64.
[7] 王海涛, 肖天存, 苏继新, 等. 含磷阻垢剂对重油加氢催化剂失活的影响[J]. 催化学报, 1999, 20(6):639-644.
[8] 张锐, 丁石, 刘清河, 等. 微量杂质对柴油深度加氢脱硫的影响[J]. 石油炼制与化工, 2016, 47(11):61-64.
Outlines

/